Things as they really are

Today Lama Jampa visited our sangha, giving several teachings. He mentioned (or at least Eduardo translated it that way from Tibetan) that when one is in the state of the Buddha, things are perceived as they really are.
Since I had learned from Eduardo that in Buddhism things are composed by object, subject, and action, I did not understand the meaning of Lama Jampa's words, so I asked.
My translated summary of what I understood of the translation of Lama Jampa's summary is the following: You cannot really see things (they are in between being, not being, being and being, and not {being and not being}). The phrase "things as they really are" means that one realizes causality and relationships between all things, i.e. that no thing is isolated. I find this very interesting, because this is precisely what the scientific study of complex systems does, as opposed to traditional reductionistic science (since Galileo, Descartes, Newton, Laplace). We study the relevance of interactions among different phenomena, and that is my personal view of what makes complexity complexity (not many elements, not non-linearity, not self-organization, not emergence, etc. All these properties are very interesting, but the defining characteristic of complex systems, for me, is the relevance of interactions in the future state of elements).
So, trying to synthesize: A clearer description of the world is one which takes into account interactions, as opposed to one description that does not put attention to them. Scientist, pay attention, reductionism no no. (can you tell that I enjoy spending lots of time with my 2 year old daughter?)

Comments

Keith said…
Carlos, I have just discovered your work and I am very excited about it, so I will be contacting you. Specifically considering this post - I am sure you are aware that finding common themes between eastern philosophy/ metaphysics and modern physics is quite trendy (first made famous by Fritjof Kapra’s ‘Tao of Physics’). The usual idea is that modern physics suggests all things are connected (at the quantum scale via wave function interaction) and I know you are aware of Wheeler’s interpretation of ‘it from bit’ and the ‘observer generated universe’ which seems to place humans (especially physicists) in a special cosmological position! A rather stronger argument, though, is that all things are what they are entirely because of the semantic (meaningful) information which orders matter/energy in space/time. Indeed the universe is the implementation of meaning (information, space/time and energy/matter are the three elements of existence). The meaning is not spontaneously created out of nothing (as it appears), but rather the history of the universe from big-bang onwards has been one of self-assembly of meaning by means of filtering (analogous to resonance which selects a frequency for amplification) - a process of physical evolution in which packages of information act as environments for each other (an idea close to that of the Principia Cybernetica crowd). This process is evolution by natural selection when it operates on life. Through these ‘resonances’, the universe is assembling ever-increasing complexity - life is part of this process and has accelerated it, arguably we humans have boosted it further. In this way we are very much part of the whole universe - we are highly concentrated localisations of meaningful information. We are part of a hierarchy of complex systems constructed out of the information of the universe - order filtered out of the randomness. All is complex system and necessarily dynamic and therefore a) non-permanent and b) inseparable from its surrounding environment (upon which its meaning depends). These two conclusions are core teachings of the Buddhists.
5:59 PM
Keith said…
Carlos, I have just discovered your work and I am very excited about it, so I will be contacting you. Specifically considering this post - I am sure you are aware that finding common themes between eastern philosophy/ metaphysics and modern physics is quite trendy (first made famous by Fritjof Kapra’s ‘Tao of Physics’). The usual idea is that modern physics suggests all things are connected (at the quantum scale via wave function interaction) and I know you are aware of Wheeler’s interpretation of ‘it from bit’ and the ‘observer generated universe’ which seems to place humans (especially physicists) in a special cosmological position! A rather stronger argument, though, is that all things are what they are entirely because of the semantic (meaningful) information which orders matter/energy in space/time. Indeed the universe is the implementation of meaning (information, space/time and energy/matter are the three elements of existence). The meaning is not spontaneously created out of nothing (as it appears), but rather the history of the universe from big-bang onwards has been one of self-assembly of meaning by means of filtering (analogous to resonance which selects a frequency for amplification) - a process of physical evolution in which packages of information act as environments for each other (an idea close to that of the Principia Cybernetica crowd). This process is evolution by natural selection when it operates on life. Through these ‘resonances’, the universe is assembling ever-increasing complexity - life is part of this process and has accelerated it, arguably we humans have boosted it further. In this way we are very much part of the whole universe - we are highly concentrated localisations of meaningful information. We are part of a hierarchy of complex systems constructed out of the information of the universe - order filtered out of the randomness. All is complex system and necessarily dynamic and therefore a) non-permanent and b) inseparable from its surrounding environment (upon which its meaning depends). These two conclusions are core teachings of the Buddhists.
6:00 PM
Carlos said…
Thanks for the comments, Keith!
6:52 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Past, Present and Future of Cybernetics and Systems Research

Summary of "The Past, Present and Future of Cybernetics and Systems Research" Symposium M at  European Meetings on Cybernetics and Systems Research (EMCSR), Vienna, Austria, April 12, 2012. Organizer: Carlos Gershenson This guided reflection on the challenges and opportunities of cybernetics and systems research (CSR) included initial interventions by panelists Peter Erdi, Helena Knyazeva, Stefan Thurner, Peter Csermely, and Alexander Lazlo. Afterwards, the floor was opened to interventions from the general public and further interventions by panelists. Commentaries were made from a broad variety of perspectives, but several general ideas can be distilled from the discussion. CSR have strongly influenced all scientific disciplines. As an example, the term "system" is used commonly in daily language. One of the breakthroughs of CSR lies in the search of commonalities across disciplines. Even when this was achieved to a certain degree, there is still a lack of
Read more

flocking memes...

Some ideas just came up, after a talk I had with Klaas , who is making a PhD on memetics... In cultural transmission of fads and so on, I've heard that there are models in which the majority imitates an elite, and the elite tries to go away from the crowd, and that gives you the dynamics... The idea is that maybe another way of looking at this phenomenon is to take the analogy of flocking: birds try to keep together (safety, direction, whatever reason), but also keep average distance to their neighbours (not to crash). If we take this mechanism into the memetic space, people will imitate many aspects surrounding them, just because of mirron neurons and the evolutionary advantage of imitation. But the separation is also important, for people assert their individuality with it... This could be seen as taking the inverse of a meme... starting to sounds like dialectics... (who would have thought that Hegel and starlings had lots in common...) Of course in the social context there are m
Read more

PhD thesis: "final" version online

After making several minor corrections, I have a "final" version of my thesis, which you can download here . I should defend it privately on April 20th, and if everything goes well, the public defense would be on May 2nd. Everybody's welcome! Design and Control of Self-organizing Systems PhD Dissertation presented by Carlos Gershenson Promoters: Prof. Dr. Bart D’Hooghe and Prof. Dr. Francis Heylighen Advisors: Prof. Dr. Bruce Edmonds Prof. Dr. Bernard Manderick Prof. Dr. Peter McBurney Prof. Dr. Ann Nowé Abstract Complex systems are usually difficult to design and control. There are several particular methods for coping with complexity, but there is no general approach to build complex systems. In this thesis I propose a methodology to aid engineers in the design and control of complex systems. This is based on the description of systems as self-organizing . Starting from the agent metaphor, the methodology proposes a conceptual framework and a se
Read more